Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Santos, J. M., Horta, H. & Zhang, L. - F. (2020). The association of thinking styles with research agendas among academics in the social sciences. Higher Education Quarterly. 74 (2), 193-210
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
J. M. Santos et al.,  "The association of thinking styles with research agendas among academics in the social sciences", in Higher Education Quarterly, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 193-210, 2020
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{santos2020_1714004434067,
	author = "Santos, J. M. and Horta, H. and Zhang, L. - F.",
	title = "The association of thinking styles with research agendas among academics in the social sciences",
	journal = "Higher Education Quarterly",
	year = "2020",
	volume = "74",
	number = "2",
	doi = "10.1111/hequ.12240",
	pages = "193-210",
	url = "https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12240"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The association of thinking styles with research agendas among academics in the social sciences
T2  - Higher Education Quarterly
VL  - 74
IS  - 2
AU  - Santos, J. M.
AU  - Horta, H.
AU  - Zhang, L. - F.
PY  - 2020
SP  - 193-210
SN  - 0951-5224
DO  - 10.1111/hequ.12240
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12240
AB  - Research agendas are understudied, despite being key to academic knowledge creation. The literature suggests that the ways that academics determine their research agendas are conditioned by individual, organisational and environmental characteristics. This study explores the cognitive aspects of academics' research agendas in the social sciences by using a theory on thinking styles as an analytical framework. The results suggest that the research agendas of academics in the social sciences are significantly associated with their thinking styles. These findings aid understanding of how academics set their research agendas. This study also represents an important landmark in research on thinking styles, focusing on academic research work as a potential venue for further studies. The findings are relevant for policymakers, research funding agencies, university administrators and academics because they have implications for academic research development processes, outcomes, and for research and academic identity socialisation during doctoral studies.
ER  -