Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Madureira, C., Rando, B. & Ferraz, D. (2021). The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions. International Journal of Public Administration. 44 (4), 300-310
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
C. N. Madureira et al.,  "The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions", in Int. Journal of Public Administration, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 300-310, 2021
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{madureira2021_1732198016120,
	author = "Madureira, C. and Rando, B. and Ferraz, D.",
	title = "The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions",
	journal = "International Journal of Public Administration",
	year = "2021",
	volume = "44",
	number = "4",
	doi = "10.1080/01900692.2020.1719510",
	pages = "300-310",
	url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/lpad20/0/0"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions
T2  - International Journal of Public Administration
VL  - 44
IS  - 4
AU  - Madureira, C.
AU  - Rando, B.
AU  - Ferraz, D.
PY  - 2021
SP  - 300-310
SN  - 0190-0692
DO  - 10.1080/01900692.2020.1719510
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/lpad20/0/0
AB  - As part of managerial reform process, in 2004 the Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) was set up in Portugal. This study aimed to analyze the perceptions of Portuguese civil servants on this appraisal system. A second drive was to understand how those perceptions change depending on what extent the model is perceived as fair or not. A survey was carried out and data were collected from 2066 civil servants, including managers. The results show very negative perceptions, in particular regarding SIADAP’s objectivity, transparency and fairness. Also, Kruskal-Wallis tests and post-hoc paired comparisons reveal that civil servants who see the system as “unfair” tend to have more negative perceptions on it than those who see it as “fair” or those who are not sure about the fairness of the system. 
ER  -