Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Nico, Magda (2021). Identity and change of a field: A literature analysis of the concept of social mobility. Social Science Information. 60 (3), 457-748
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
M. L. Nico,  "Identity and change of a field: A literature analysis of the concept of social mobility", in Social Science Information, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 457-748, 2021
Exportar BibTeX
@article{nico2021_1714188524397,
	author = "Nico, Magda",
	title = "Identity and change of a field: A literature analysis of the concept of social mobility",
	journal = "Social Science Information",
	year = "2021",
	volume = "60",
	number = "3",
	doi = "10.1177/05390184211022178",
	pages = "457-748",
	url = "https://journals.sagepub.com/home/ssi"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Identity and change of a field: A literature analysis of the concept of social mobility
T2  - Social Science Information
VL  - 60
IS  - 3
AU  - Nico, Magda
PY  - 2021
SP  - 457-748
SN  - 0539-0184
DO  - 10.1177/05390184211022178
UR  - https://journals.sagepub.com/home/ssi
AB  - Social mobility is one of the concepts which is the most intrinsically bound to sociology. Hence, the diachronic analysis of this concept contributes to our understanding of sociology and the way that the discipline has changed, as it turned to individual social trajectories according to different topics. Aimed at contributing to this understanding, I’ve developed a literature review based on a systematic collection of the scientific publications in social sciences directly addressing social mobility. A database with conceptual and methodological variables was compiled (N=1054) and worked on. Distinct periods in the life course of this concept have been identified, with the emergence of a scattered concept (1920–1959), the golden age of social mobility (1960–1989), followed by a period of fragmentation and resistance (1990–2012). These three periods are characterized by different methodological and geographical hegemonies, flows and volumes of publications, and also by different tendencies and theoretical and disciplinary rivalries.
ER  -