Ciência_Iscte
Publications
Publication Detailed Description
Scientific journal paper
Q1
Journal Title
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Year (definitive publication)
2025
Language
English
Country
United States of America
More Information
Web of Science®
Scopus
Google Scholar
This publication is not indexed in Overton
Abstract
Ideal partner preferences (i.e., ratings of the desirability of attributes like attractiveness or intelligence) are the source of numerous foundational findings in the interdisciplinary literature on human mating. Recently, research on the predictive validity of ideal partner preference matching (i.e., Do people positively evaluate partners who match vs. mismatch their ideals?) has become mired in several problems. First, articles exhibit discrepant analytic and reporting practices. Second, different findings emerge across laboratories worldwide, perhaps because they sample different relationship contexts and/or populations. This registered report—partnered with the Psychological Science Accelerator—uses a highly powered design (N = 10,358) across 43 countries and 22 languages to estimate preference-matching effect sizes. The most rigorous tests revealed significant preference-matching effects in the whole sample and for partnered and single participants separately. The “corrected pattern metric” that collapses across 35 traits revealed a zero-order effect of ? = .19 and an effect of ? = .11 when included alongside a normative preference-matching metric. Specific traits in the “level metric” (interaction) tests revealed very small (average ? = .04) effects. Effect sizes were similar for partnered participants who reported ideals before entering a relationship, and there was no consistent evidence that individual differences moderated any effects. Comparisons between stated and revealed preferences shed light on gender differences and similarities: For attractiveness, men’s and (especially) women’s stated preferences underestimated revealed preferences (i.e., they thought attractiveness was less important than it actually was). For earning potential, men’s stated preferences underestimated—and women’s stated preferences overestimated—revealed preferences. Implications for the literature on human mating are discussed.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Attraction,Close relationships,Human mating,Ideals,Matching hypothesis
Fields of Science and Technology Classification
- Psychology - Social Sciences
Funding Records
Funding Reference | Funding Entity |
---|---|
APVV-19-0284 | Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV |
UID/PSI/03125/2022 | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
451-03-47/2023-01 | Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia |
VEGA 1/0853/21 | Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV |
PRIMUS/24/SSH/017 | NPO |
JP22K18263 | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science |
#2235066 | U.S. National Science Foundation |
APVV-22-0458 | NPO |
K23DK115820 | National Institutes of Health |
JP20H04581 | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science |
#62295 | John Templeton Foundation |
LX22NPO5101 | NPO |
2020/0738 | Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie World Wildlife Fund |
JP21H03784 | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science |
DP180102384 | Australian Research Council |
B.A.CG-20-02170 | Sabanci University Integration |
62631 | John Templeton Foundation |
BCS-1941440 | National Science Foundation |
Contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations
With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência_Iscte. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.