Scientific journal paper Q1
Designing democratic innovations: A methodological framework for participation in urban planning and governance
Isabella Rusconi (Rusconi, I.); Fernando Nogueira (Nogueira, F.); Alexandra Paio (Paio, A.); José Carlos Baptista da Mota (Mota, J. C.);
Journal Title
Archnet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research
Year (definitive publication)
N/A
Language
English
Country
United Kingdom
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2025-12-19 14:06)

View record in Web of Science®

Scopus

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2025-12-17 14:16)

View record in Scopus

Google Scholar

Times Cited: 1

(Last checked: 2025-12-18 20:01)

View record in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
Purpose Cities are strengthening their role as arenas for political action, crucial for addressing crises in a context of rampant uncertainty. This emphasises the need to centre public participation in decision-making to accelerate changes and ensure social responsiveness. However, a gap persists between rhetoric and implementation of participation mechanisms, highlighting the importance of democratic innovations (DIs) in fostering inclusive governance, especially in urban planning. This paper introduces the democracy radar framework (DRF), a tool to guide and evaluate DIs in urban planning and governance. It supports institutional design by guiding decisions around participation, comparing approaches across urban environments and facilitating knowledge exchange between cities. Design/methodology/approach The DRF was developed through a critical literature review. It establishes four participation objectives: (1) transferring decision-making power to those affected, (2) distributing socio-spatial justice, (3) strengthening trust and community ties and (4) promoting inclusion. These are combined with three structural dimensions: What to participate in? How? Who participates? It includes 12 analytical criteria organised according to these objectives and was applied in a qualitative comparative analysis of DIs in Lisbon. Findings The case study findings highlight the potential of well-designed DIs to bridge civil society and government, fostering collaboration between social and political movements to transform institutional structures. This alignment between urban planning, local governance and participatory objectives supports the emergence of new forms of direct democracy. Originality/value This research contributes to a novel framework for guiding, evaluating and comparing DIs, supporting learning and knowledge transfer across initiatives, contexts and cities. As an open framework, it invites contributions and further adaptation, enabling advancements in comparative research.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Democratic innovations,Institutional design,Participatory governance,Urban planning
  • Other Social Sciences - Social Sciences
  • Arts (arts, history of arts, performing arts, music) - Humanities
  • Other Humanities - Humanities
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
2021.07625.BD Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência_Iscte. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.