Review article Q1
Digital assistive technologies for community-dwelling people with dementia: A systematic review of systematic reviews by the INTERDEM AI & assistive technology taskforce
David Neal (Neal, D.); Michael P Craven (Craven, M. P.); Jane Cross (Cross, J.); Shirley Evans (Evans, S.); Christopher Fox (Fox, C.); Laila Oksnebjerg (Oksnebjerg, L.); Isabel Machado Alexandre (Alexandre, I.); Aidin Aryankhesal (Aryankhesal, A.); Arlene Astell (Astell, A.); Ahmet Begde (Begde, A.); Annabel Ditton (Ditton, A.); Thomas Engelsma (Engelsma, T.); Rikke Gregersen (Gregersen, R.); Pascale Heins (Heins, P.); Eef Hogervorst (Hogervorst, E.); Aysegul Humeyra Kafadar (Kafadar, A. H.); Jackie Poos (Poos, J.); Louise Robinson (Robinson, L.); Duygu Sezgin (Sezgin, D.); Hanneke JA Smaling (Smaling, H. J. ); Dorota Szczesniak (Szczesniak, D.); Josephine Rose Orejana Tan (Tan, J. R. O.); Marjolein de Vugt (de Vugt, M.); Franka JM Meiland (Meiland, F. J.); et al.
Journal Title
Digital Health
Year (definitive publication)
2025
Language
English
Country
United Kingdom
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 1

(Last checked: 2025-12-04 14:27)

View record in Web of Science®

Scopus

This publication is not indexed in Scopus

Google Scholar

Times Cited: 2

(Last checked: 2025-12-04 17:09)

View record in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
Introduction The use of digital assistive technologies by and for people living with dementia is promising for supporting social health and advocated as a partial solution to growing prevalence worldwide. A state-of-the-art position paper published in 2017 identified challenges regarding digital assistive technologies, around five themes: development, usability, (cost-)effectiveness, implementation and ethics. This systematic review summarizes progress on the challenges found in 2017, and persisting or emerging challenges. Methods A systematic review of systematic reviews was conducted, focused on studies published after 2016. The inclusion criteria required that the target group included, at least in part, people with dementia living in the community and that the technologies aimed to support social health. For the five themes, literature searches were conducted in Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase databases. Results A total of 112 reviews were included, covering various applications such as smart homes, care robots, exergaming and everyday technologies. No applications of artificial intelligence were included. The challenges included personalization of applications (development); limited use of standardized methods (usability); insufficient quantity and quality of randomized controlled trials (cost-effectiveness); overly high expectations of assistive technologies (implementation); and the need for more equitable access to technologies (ethics). Conclusion Much research has been conducted since the 2017 state of the art position paper. While some challenges identified at that time remain relevant, others have been addressed, and new challenges have emerged. Future research should prioritize emerging artificial intelligence applications; the development of integrated assistive technologies; evaluation using robust methods and meaningful outcomes; and the promotion of more accessible and inclusive technologies.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Dementia,Assistive technology,Digital health,Artificial intelligence,Systematic review,Development,Usability,Implementation,Cost-effectiveness,Ethics
  • Computer and Information Sciences - Natural Sciences
  • Biological Sciences - Natural Sciences

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência_Iscte. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.