Scientific journal paper Q1
Evaluation of retrofitting techniques for historical adobe constructions using a multi-criteria decision analysis: The case study of Chile
Pilar Baquedano Juliá (Juliá, P. B.); Stefania Stellacci (Stellacci, S.); Elisa Poletti (Poletti, E.);
Journal Title
International Journal of Architectural Heritage
Year (definitive publication)
2024
Language
English
Country
United States of America
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 1

(Last checked: 2024-10-02 01:19)

View record in Web of Science®

Scopus

Times Cited: 1

(Last checked: 2024-10-02 04:00)

View record in Scopus

Google Scholar

Times Cited: 2

(Last checked: 2024-09-27 01:43)

View record in Google Scholar

Abstract
The evaluation of retrofitting techniques against multiple (often conflicting) criteria requires an expert-driven approach with in-depth context-based knowledge. This research evaluates the expected performance of retrofitting techniques for historical adobe constructions by integrating literature-data and expert assessment. Consideration is given to performance-based criteria (structural behaviour, material compatibility), values around cultural built heritage (degree of intrusion, retreatability), and local constraints (cost-effectiveness). A multi-criteria decision analysis using MACBETH (Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical-Based Evaluation TecHnique) is undertaken in this study in order to facilitate the selection process for retrofitting techniques within distinct damage scenarios. The MACBETH model is applied to three historical adobe buildings in Chile using a weighted criteria matrix, while a sensitivity analysis is conducted to determine the stability of interventions. The best-scoring options for each damage pattern are then compared with national guidelines and the current practice. Among the best-ranking solutions obtained from MACBETH models, the use of wooden corner keys makes it possible to effectively counteract flexural cracks or mid-height cracks, damage at intersections of perpendicular walls, corner-damage vertical cracks, and in-plane damage. Wooden tie beams are effective solutions for corner-damage vertical cracks. Geo-mesh also obtains a high score yet is limited by its cost and low reversibility.
Acknowledgements
This work is based on the study financed by EC-funded ELARCH programme and by the National Agency for Research and Development (ANID). It is financed by FCT, ISTAR Projects: UIDB/04466/202.
Keywords
Historical adobe buildings,Multi-criteria decision analysis,Participatory analysis,Performance-based assessment,Retrofitting,Chile
  • Computer and Information Sciences - Natural Sciences
  • Civil Engineering - Engineering and Technology
  • Materials Engineering - Engineering and Technology
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
UIDB/04466/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
UIDP/04466/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Related Projects

This publication is an output of the following project(s):

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência-IUL. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.