Immigration is a hot topic in Europe, but research on the media effects on public attention to immigration remains limited. We examine how media coverage affects the degree of importance attached to immigration in seven Western European Union member states. Data come from an extensive analysis of claims in printed newspapers, and the Eurobarometer (2002–2009). The continuous sample of news coverage is aggregated into a biannual panel, and we relate these data to citizens’ perceptions of the most important issues in their country 6 months later (lagged). The public consider immigration more important than other policy-related issues when there is an increase in the volume of news and more political claims on the topic in the media. The media environment appears to be an exogenous actor that can have agenda-setting effects on public concern about immigration. Our results highlight limitations of both the ‘policy-gap’ thesis and thermostatic models of policy making

The authors would like to acknowledge the work and comments provided by: Erik Bleich, Elizabeth Carter, Charles Lees, Pedro Magalhães, James Deninson, Joanna Clifton-Sprigg, Lenka Dražanová, Sabina Kubiciel-Lodzinska, Sebastian Rinken, and the anonymous r

Immigration,Media,Public concern,Agenda-setting,Most important issue,Policy-gaps

• Ciências Políticas - Ciências Sociais