The Horn of Africa and the Persian Gulf have millennial relations characterised by mutual interaction and influences. However, from the Cold War period onwards, international relations scholars focusing on strategic and security analysis have used a realist approach to depict these relations as largely one-way involvement and influence from the Gulf to the Horn of Africa. Yet, this approach portrays the Horn of Africa as a Gulf and other middle and great powers’ strategic chessboard and fails to account for the reality of political dynamics in the Horn of Africa and the agency of the local state and non-state actors in their external relations. This article argues that the realist approach’s depiction of foreign relations mainly as power struggles between unitary state actors is reductionist and presents an inadequate framework for the analysis of the Horn of Africa’s complex external relationships involving various state and powerful societal (non-state) actors. This privileges structure over agency disproportionally, requiring recalibration of the realist framework’s conceptualisation of the ‘state’ and ‘power’. As a result, the article proposes that a more nuanced actor-based account which includes domestic political dynamics and locally prominent internationally active societal actors is necessary for a more realistic analysis of the Horn’s external relations.

--

Horn of Africa,Realism,State,Power,External relations,State and societal actors

• Psychology - Social Sciences
• Economics and Business - Social Sciences
• Educational Sciences - Social Sciences
• Sociology - Social Sciences
• Law - Social Sciences
• Political Science - Social Sciences
• Social and Economic Geography - Social Sciences
• Media and Communications - Social Sciences
• Other Social Sciences - Social Sciences
• History and Archeology - Humanities
• Philosophy, Ethics and Religion - Humanities
• Arts (arts, history of arts, performing arts, music) - Humanities
• Other Humanities - Humanities
• Anthropology - Social Sciences