Scientific journal paper Q1
Institutional and economic determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure by banks: institutional perspectives
Jonas Oliveira (Oliveira, J.); Graça Maria do Carmo Azevedo (Azevedo, G.); Maria José Pires Carvalho da Silva (Silva, M. J.);
Journal Title
Meditari Accountancy Research
Year (definitive publication)
2019
Language
English
Country
United Kingdom
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 21

(Last checked: 2024-08-23 02:34)

View record in Web of Science®


: 6.0
Scopus

Times Cited: 19

(Last checked: 2024-08-20 21:20)

View record in Scopus


: 1.0
Google Scholar

Times Cited: 34

(Last checked: 2024-08-24 09:22)

View record in Google Scholar

Abstract
Purpose: This article explores the firm and country-level institutional forces that determine banks’ CSR reporting diversity, during the recent global financial crisis. Design/methodology/approach: Specifically, the present article assesses if economic and institutional conditions explain CSR disclosure strategies used by thirty listed and unlisted banks from six countries in the context of the recent 2007/2008 Global Financial Crisis. The annual reports and social responsibility reports of the largest banks in Canada, UK, France, Italy, Spain and Portugal were content analyzed. Findings: Findings suggest that economic factors do not influence CSR disclosure. Institutional factors associated with the legal environment, industry self-regulation and the organization’s commitments in maintaining a dialogue with relevant stakeholders are crucial elements in explaining CSR reporting. Consistent with the Dillard’s et al. (2004) model, CSR disclosure by banks not only stems from institutional legitimacy processes, but also from strategic ones. Practical implications: Findings highlight the importance of CSR regulation to properly monitor managers’ opportunistic use of CSR information and regulate assurance activities (regarding standards, their profession, or even assurance) to guarantee the reliability of CSR information. Originality/Value: The study makes two major contributions. First, it extends and modifies the model used by Chih et al. (2010). Second, drawn on the new institutional sociology, this study develops a theoretical framework that combines the multilevel model of the dynamic process of institutionalization, transposition, and deinstitutionalization of organizational practices developed by Dillard et al. (2004) with the Campbell’s (2007) theoretical framework of socially responsible behaviour. This theoretical framework incorporates a more inclusive social context, aligned with a more comprehensive sociology-based institutional theory (Dillard et al., 2004; Campbell, 2007), which has never been used in the CSR reporting literature hitherto.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure,Institutional theory,Banking industry
  • Economics and Business - Social Sciences
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
UID/GES/00315/2013 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência-IUL. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.