Scientific journal paper Q1
Mass polarisation: Identification with parliamentary discourses and psychological factors
Beatriz Afonso (Afonso, B. ); Catarina Rosa (Rosa, C.); Raquel da Silva (Da Silva, R.); Pedro Bem-Haja (Bem-Haj, P. );
Journal Title
Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression
Year (definitive publication)
2024
Language
English
Country
United Kingdom
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2026-04-13 22:29)

View record in Web of Science®

Scopus

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2026-04-10 16:38)

View record in Scopus

Google Scholar

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2026-04-14 01:32)

View record in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
Ideological polarisation research has gained prominence due to its growing presence in established democracies and its associated negative consequences. This study aimed to explore the identification with polarised parliamentary discourses in a Portuguese sample and its relationship with psychological factors. Results revealed the absence of mass ideological polarisation and a greater leftist identification. Participants who identified more with the right-wing evidenced greater identity fusion with the country and dogmatism, and less tendency to ruminate and to be verbally aggressive. Participants who identified more with the left-wing showed less identity fusion with the country, less dogmatism and greater capacity for empathy, rumination, tolerance to ambiguity, and verbal aggression. Innovative results were also found on the relationship between greater left-wing identification, identity fusion with the country and verbal aggression.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Ideological polarisation,Parliamentary discourses,Psychological factors
  • Psychology - Social Sciences
  • Sociology - Social Sciences
  • Political Science - Social Sciences