Ciência_Iscte
Publications
Publication Detailed Description
Mass polarisation: Identification with parliamentary discourses and psychological factors
Journal Title
Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression
Year (definitive publication)
2024
Language
English
Country
United Kingdom
More Information
Web of Science®
Scopus
Google Scholar
This publication is not indexed in Overton
Abstract
Ideological polarisation research has gained prominence due to its growing presence in established democracies and its associated negative consequences. This study aimed to explore the identification with polarised parliamentary discourses in a Portuguese sample and its relationship with psychological factors. Results revealed the absence of mass ideological polarisation and a greater leftist identification. Participants who identified more with the right-wing evidenced greater identity fusion with the country and dogmatism, and less tendency to ruminate and to be verbally aggressive. Participants who identified more with the left-wing showed less identity fusion with the country, less dogmatism and greater capacity for empathy, rumination, tolerance to ambiguity, and verbal aggression. Innovative results were also found on the relationship between greater left-wing identification, identity fusion with the country and verbal aggression.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Ideological polarisation,Parliamentary discourses,Psychological factors
Fields of Science and Technology Classification
- Psychology - Social Sciences
- Sociology - Social Sciences
- Political Science - Social Sciences
Português