Scientific journal paper Q1
‘Meating’ the animal and moral emotions: Exploring animal caring and cruelty appeals for dietary change
Rui Pedro Fonseca (Fonseca, R. P.); Ben De Groeve (De Groeve, B.);
Journal Title
Appetite
Year (definitive publication)
2025
Language
English
Country
United States of America
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 1

(Last checked: 2025-12-04 19:02)

View record in Web of Science®

Scopus

Times Cited: 1

(Last checked: 2025-11-25 23:29)

View record in Scopus

Google Scholar

Times Cited: 1

(Last checked: 2025-11-28 16:12)

View record in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
In modern Western societies, consumers are often disconnected from the animal origins of meat, which facilitates meat consumption by reducing empathy towards animals, and feelings of disgust and guilt. Conversely, animal advocates may appeal to meat’s animal origins to evoke moral emotions that discourage meat consumption. This preregistered study investigated the effectiveness of such meat-animal reminders among 421 meat-eating participants from the UK, recruited via Prolific. Participants were randomly exposed to one of three images: a pork chop without animal reminder (control condition), a pork chop paired with a human petting a pig (animal caring appeal) or paired with a human stunning a pig before slaughter (animal cruelty appeal). Based on harm-based accounts of moral judgment, we measured moral emotions oriented to the pig victim (e.g., empathy, sadness), the human perpetrator (e.g., anger, disgust) and the self (e.g., guilt, shame), and examined their effects on participants’ willingness to change pork chop consumption and tendency to justify pork-eating. ANOVA analysis revealed that both animal appeals (vs. control) increased moral emotions, while mediation analyses indicated that these emotions indirectly decreased pork-eating justification and increased willingness for dietary change. The animal cruelty appeal seemed particularly effective by evoking perpetrator- and victim-oriented emotions. However, we also found evidence of counteractive effects on pork-eating justification and willingness for dietary change once moral emotions were controlled for, suggesting moral disengagement. Hedonic motivations to eat meat remain a significant barrier. Future research should further explore interventions that enable consumers to translate moral concerns into lasting dietary change.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Meat consumption,Moral emotions,Animal cruelty,Dietary change,Persuasion
  • Other Social Sciences - Social Sciences
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
UIDB/03126/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência_Iscte. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.