Scientific journal paper Q1
Mediating Bolsonarism on Facebook: Religion, technopolitics and activism in grassroots digital networks
Gleice Mattos Luz (Luz, G. M.); Cláudia Álvares (Álvares, C.);
Journal Title
Media, Culture and Society
Year (definitive publication)
N/A
Language
English
Country
United Kingdom
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2025-12-03 22:32)

View record in Web of Science®

Scopus

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2025-12-04 23:29)

View record in Scopus

Google Scholar

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2025-11-28 20:38)

View record in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
This study examines the intersections of religion and technopolitics in Bolsonarism through an in-depth case study of a prominent digital moderator, Actor 1, who mediated between Jair Bolsonaro’s leadership and grassroots supporters during Brazil’s 2022 electoral period. By employing ethnographic observations, semi-structured interviews, Critical Discourse Analysis, and Framing Theory, this research explores a multilayered model of mediation that merges the strategic coordination of programmed campaigns with the emotional authenticity of grassroots spontaneity. Through the strategic exploitation of Facebook’s algorithmic architecture, emotionally resonant content was widely disseminated, creating echo chambers that reinforced ingroup loyalty while excluding dissent. Religious framing was central to these efforts, positioning Bolsonaro as a divinely ordained leader whose political struggles integrated a larger spiritual mission. Actor 1 emerges as a paradigmatic intermediary, whose communicative practices integrate opinion leadership, moral-political curation, religious framing, and strategic activism. Religion plays an important role, positioning Bolsonaro as a divinely ordained leader whose political struggles were embedded in a broader spiritual mission. The study demonstrates how technopolitical strategies, intertwined with religious discourse, were used to adapt to regulatory pressures by casting institutional supervision as censorship. These practices shaped collective identities, sustained ideological cohesion, and rallied supporters within a polarized sociopolitical context.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Digital activism,Bolsonarism,Technopolitics,Social media,Religious framing,Grassroots mediation,Digital populism
  • Sociology - Social Sciences
  • Media and Communications - Social Sciences