Scientific journal paper Q2
Morals and Ethics in Counterterrorism
Marco Marsili (Marsili, M.);
Journal Title
Conatus - Journal of Philosophy
Year (definitive publication)
2023
Language
English
Country
Greece
More Information
Web of Science®

This publication is not indexed in Web of Science®

Scopus

Times Cited: 1

(Last checked: 2024-05-18 06:34)

View record in Scopus


: 2.4
Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Google Scholar

Abstract
Political leaders, philosophers, sociologists, historians, political scientists, law scholars and economists approach terrorism in diverse ways, especially its definition. Politicians assign the meaning to the term terrorism that best suits them. Political scientists analyze the actions of those in the geopolitical framework. Moral philosophers look at terrorism from the viewpoint of fairness. Historians make a comparative assessment of the phenomenon through its evolution over time, and scholars of law simply dissect counterterrorism measures and assess their consistency with customs and current legislation. Sociologists stress the importance of culture, social relationships and social interactions. Eventually, politicians and lawmakers are not immune to the influence of the common ethics and morals of their own societies and the uses and habits of their own cultures, including religious aspects. Morals and ethics relate to “right” and “wrong” conduct; the first provides guiding principles, and the latter refers to rules provided by an external source, e.g., codes of conduct in workplaces or principles in religions. While morals are concerned with principles of right and wrong, ethics are related to right and wrong conduct of an individual in a particular situation. Ethics, morals and religion are intertwined in the antithetical principles “good and evil”. This work aims to scrutinize the crucial concept of just and unjust war, and just and unjust combatants, and to elaborate on some critical moral and ethical elements within the modern understanding of the interplay between terrorism, counterterrorism, fundamental human rights, and international humanitarian law. Through the examination of all pertinent theoretical positions the paper seeks to shed light on the limits of the use of force and the justification of the violation of fundamental rights in the War on Terror.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
ethics,morals,terrorism,counterterrorism,just war,unjust combatant,unlawful combatant,terrorist
  • Sociology - Social Sciences
  • Law - Social Sciences
  • Political Science - Social Sciences
  • Other Social Sciences - Social Sciences
  • History and Archeology - Humanities
  • Philosophy, Ethics and Religion - Humanities
  • Other Humanities - Humanities
  • Anthropology - Social Sciences
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
SFRH/BD/136170/2018 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência-IUL. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.