Artigo de revisão Q1
Post-traumatic stress disorder in peacekeepers: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Laura Carmona (Carmona, L.); Cláudia Camilo (Camilo, C.); Vânia Sofia Carvalho (Carvalho, V. S.); Maria José Chambel (Chambel, M. J. );
Título Revista
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Ano (publicação definitiva)
2024
Língua
Inglês
País
Reino Unido
Mais Informação
Web of Science®

N.º de citações: 10

(Última verificação: 2026-06-30 16:59)

Ver o registo na Web of Science®

Scopus

N.º de citações: 9

(Última verificação: 2026-06-18 08:40)

Ver o registo na Scopus


: 1.0
Google Scholar

Esta publicação não está indexada no Google Scholar

Esta publicação não está indexada no Overton

Títulos Alternativos

(Espanhol/Castelhano) Trastorno de estrés postraumático en el personal de mantenimiento de la paz: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura con metaanálisis

Abstract/Resumo
Background: In peacekeeping operations, soldiers are often exposed to the same traumatic factors as in conventional war and may also be subject to physical risks and psychological stressors associated with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). According to the Conservation of Resources Theory (COR), PTSD stems from resource depletion and inadequate restoration. Objectives: To discuss and meta-analyse PTSD-related factors among peacekeepers, based on the COR theory, framing them as resources or loss/threat of loss of resources. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed with relevant keywords, 51 articles were reviewed and 21 of them meta-analysed. Results: Factors mentioned in prior reviews, reinforced by ours, include: family/community and military support as resources; single marital status, female gender, serving in infantry, and longer time since deployment as lack of resources. Factors mentioned in prior reviews, confirmed by our meta-analysis, include: education, rank, and problem-focused coping as resources; negative perceptions about deployment, combat/trauma exposure, deployment stressors, and deployment duration as lack of resources. Factors overlooked in prior reviews include: age as a resource; negative life events, and negative social interactions as lack of resources. Comorbidities include: physical health problems, post-deployment impact on functioning, and post-deployment psychopathology (e.g., depression, substance use). Conclusions: Significantly more individual than contextual factors were identified. While some factors inherent to missions (e.g., combat exposure, deployment stressors) cannot be mitigated, others are crucial to prevent peacekeepers’ PTSD (e.g., coping strategies, deployment duration, perceptions about deployment, social interactions, support during deployment) and to inform selection and monitoring by the Armed Forces (e.g., pre-, during and post-deployment psychopathology). However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to limitations (e.g., publication bias, study heterogeneity) that may have affected the generalizability and strength of the recommendations.
Agradecimentos/Acknowledgements
--
Palavras-chave
PTSD,Peacekeepers,Peacekeeping,Post-traumatic stress disorder,Military
  • Medicina Básica - Ciências Médicas
  • Medicina Clínica - Ciências Médicas
Registos de financiamentos
Referência de financiamento Entidade Financiadora
UIDB/04527/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
UIDP/04527/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
FPUL/DGRDN/BI/2023/04 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia