Scientific journal paper Q1
Public Employment Services' Responses to the Pandemic: Examples from Portugal, Bulgaria, and Lithuania
Ana Sofia Ribeiro dos Santos (Santos, A. S. R.); Vladislava Lendzhova (Vladislava Lendzhova); Sonata Vyšniauskienė (Sonata Vyšniauskienė); Tatiana Ferreira (Ferreira, T.); João Carlos Sousa (Sousa, João Carlos); Isabel Roque (Roque, I.); Kerli Kõiv (Kerli Kõiv); Katrin Saks (Katrin Saks); Omeed Agahi (Omeed Agahi); Òscar Prieto‐Flores (Òscar Prieto‐Flores); Niall O’Higgins (Niall O’Higgins); et al.
Journal Title
Politics and Governance
Year (definitive publication)
2024
Language
English
Country
Portugal
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2024-11-22 05:34)

View record in Web of Science®

Scopus

Times Cited: 2

(Last checked: 2024-11-16 13:13)

View record in Scopus

Google Scholar

Times Cited: 3

(Last checked: 2024-11-23 00:47)

View record in Google Scholar

Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic provoked critical changes to welfare in Europe, requiring the dematerialisation of programmes and services while relying mainly on remote support. This study aims to present insights into how European public employment services have coped and adapted to the pandemic challenges, particularly regarding the digitalisation and delivery of services to young people in rural areas. It focuses on three case studies from distinct European regions: Portugal, Bulgaria, and Lithuania. It is based on an exploratory survey of public employment services national offices and qualitative data collected from public employment services offices in rural settings. It highlights the advantages and dangers of the adoption of digitalisation processes, namely considering literacy and accessibility in diverse contexts. It concludes that despite cultural and regional differences, all three countries evidenced an acceleration in service provision due to digitalisation and were capable of adjusting their practices to remote delivery. However, rural areas faced delays due to poor infrastructure, and after the pandemic, public employment privileged on-site delivery, since it is considered more effective in the training and counselling of young people.
Acknowledgements
This article was supported by Track‐In—Public Employment Services Tracking Effectiveness in Supporting Rural NEETs. This project is funded by Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway through the EEA and Norway Grants Fund for Youth Employment.
Keywords
Bulgaria,Covid-19,digitalisation,Lithuania,Portugal,public employment services
  • Sociology - Social Sciences
  • Political Science - Social Sciences