Scientific journal paper
Structural validity evidence for the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale across 15 languages
Briana Oshiro (Oshiro, B.); William H. B. McAuliffe (McAuliffe, W. H. B.); Raymond Luong (Luong, R.); Anabela Caetano Santos (Santos, A. C.); Andrej Findor (Findor, A.); Anna O. Kuzminska (Kuzminska, A. O.); Anthony Lantian (Lantian, A.); Asil A. Özdoğru (Özdoğru, A. A.); Balazs Aczel (Aczel, B.); Bojana M. Dinić (Dinić, B. M.); Christopher R. Chartier (Chartier, C. R.); Jasper Hidding (Hidding, J.); Job A. M. de Grefte (de Grefte, J. A. M.); John Protzko (Protzko, J.); Mairead Shaw (Shaw, M.); Maximilian A. Primbs (Primbs, M. A.); Nicholas A. Coles (Coles, N. A.); Patrícia Arriaga (Arriaga, P.); Patrick S. Forscher (Forscher, P. S.); Savannah C. Lewis (Lewis, S. C.); Tamás Nagy (Nagy, T.); Wieteke C. de Vries (de Vries, W. C.); William Jimenez-Leal (Jimenez-Leal, W.); Yansong Li (Li, Y.); Jessica Kay Flake (Flake, J. K.); et al.
Journal Title
Psychological Test Adaptation and Development
Year (definitive publication)
2024
Language
English
Country
Germany
More Information
Web of Science®

This publication is not indexed in Web of Science®

Scopus

This publication is not indexed in Scopus

Google Scholar

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2024-05-13 20:20)

View record in Google Scholar

Abstract
Background: The Psychological Science Accelerator (PSA) recently completed a large-scale moral psychology study using translated versions of the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale (OUS). However, the translated versions have no validity evidence. Objective: The study investigated the structural validity evidence of the OUS across 15 translated versions and produced version-specific validity reports. Methods: We analyzed OUS data from the PSA, which was collected internationally on a centralized online questionnaire. We also collected qualitative feedback from experts for each translated version. Results: For each version, we produced version-specific psychometric reports which include the following: (1) descriptive item and demographics analyses, (2) factor structure evidence using confirmatory factor analyses, (3) measurement invariance testing across languages using multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses and alignment optimization, and (4) reliability analyses using coefficients ? and ?.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Oxford Utilitarianism Scale,Translation,Measurement invariance,Reliability,Psychological Science Accelerator
  • Psychology - Social Sciences
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
249040, 2019 Ware’s Prospector’s Innovation Fund
SSHRC 430-2021-00239 Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência-IUL. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.