Scientific journal paper Q2
Should the federal government reallocate funds within federal transfers?
Tiago Miguel Neves Guterres Sequeira (Sequeira, T. N.); Alexandra Ferreira-Lopes (Ferreira-Lopes, A.);
Journal Title
Public Finance Review
Year (definitive publication)
2009
Language
English
Country
United Kingdom
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 1

(Last checked: 2024-05-19 22:01)

View record in Web of Science®

Scopus

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2024-05-15 23:30)

View record in Scopus

Google Scholar

Times Cited: 4

(Last checked: 2024-05-19 12:35)

View record in Google Scholar

Abstract
It is recognized that one of the goals of federal transfers is to provide the states with some financial leverage during recessions. Federal transfers in the United States comprise such components as retirement and disability payments for individuals, other direct payments for individuals or organizations, grants, procurement contracts, and salaries and wages. Is the composition of the federal transfers’ budget having an optimal effect on the business cycle or should the federal government reallocate some expenditure? In this article, we argue that the federal government may improve its role in stabilizing the business cycle if some reallocation is made from procurement contracts and payments for other than individuals to direct payments for individuals, grants, and disability and retirement payments.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Components of federal transfers; Business cycles; Panel data; GMM
  • Economics and Business - Social Sciences
  • Political Science - Social Sciences

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência-IUL. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.