This article examines how Soviet nationalities policy shaped post-Soviet ethnic conflicts. It argues that Soviet ethnofederalism—while promoting nominal autonomy—entrenched ethnic identities and borders, enabling later fragmentation. Using a structural-historical approach, it traces continuities in institutions, elite networks, and symbolic geographies from the USSR to contemporary disputes. Case studies from Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Nagorno-Karabakh show how autonomy structures fostered secessionist mobilization. Crimea and Donbas illustrate how Russia has revived Soviet-era institutions and narratives for geopolitical aims. The study reconceptualizes Soviet federalism as a legacy regime, highlighting durable path dependency in identity, legitimacy, and violence, and challenging collapse-as-rupture narratives in favor of continuity in post-imperial politics.

--

• Sociologia - Ciências Sociais
• Direito - Ciências Sociais
• Ciências Políticas - Ciências Sociais
• Geografia Económica e Social - Ciências Sociais
• Outras Ciências Sociais - Ciências Sociais
• História e Arqueologia - Humanidades
• Filosofia, Ética e Religião - Humanidades
• Antropologia - Ciências Sociais