Talk
State-driven Hate Speech: from Nazi Germany to Date
Marco Marsili (Marsili, M.);
Event Title
Freedom of Expression, Hate Speech, and Religious Freedom: A Human Rights Perspective
Year (definitive publication)
2022
Language
English
Country
United States of America
More Information
Web of Science®

This publication is not indexed in Web of Science®

Scopus

This publication is not indexed in Scopus

Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Google Scholar

Abstract
Legal definitions of hate speech vary from country to country and is matter of both civil law and criminal law (hate crime). It is generally intended as a public speech that expresses hate or encourages violence towards a person or group based on something such as race, skin, colour, national origin, ethnicity, sex, gender identity, disability, religion, or sexual orientation. Nazi Germany is an instructive example of how far the hateful and extremist speech can go. The hate speech towards Jews – which comes from far away, at least from the Middle Ages – has never subsided, and is fueled by the confrontation with the Palestinians and the Arabs. On the other hand, over the last decade jihadist terrorism has triggered a wave of islamophobia in Europe, the biggest one after clash between Christians and Muslims in Middle Ages. Alongside situations that have grabbed the headlines and the attention of the world public opinion, there are "regional" issues of no less importance. The hate speech supports the ethnic cleansing – genocide for some – of the Muslim minorities in Myanmar (Rohingya), in Xinjiang, China (Uyghurs, a Turkic-speaking ethnic group, and other ethnic and religious minorities), and of Darfuri during the conflict in Western Sudan (2003-ongoing). In neighbouring India, the Hindu nationalists spread hate speech and incite violence against the Muslim community and other minorities. There are historical precedents, of which the Holocaust is the best known, showing that hate speech can be a precursor to atrocity crimes on a wider scale, including genocide, from Rwanda (1994, against the Tutsi) to Bosnia (1995, more than 7,000 Bosnian Muslim killed by Bosnian Serb forces in Srebrenica, Bosnia-Herzegovina) to Cambodia (1975-1979, in which approximately 1.7 million people, 21% of the country's population, were killed by the Communist group known as the Khmer Rouge). The present Russian question generates two-way hatred with Ukraine and the West, fueled by deep faking propaganda and cognitive warfare. This paper aims to shed light on the state-driven hate speech which is going on in some countries.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
genocide,human rights,nazis,nazi gernamy,cambodia,holocaust,final solution,international law,criminal law,state violence,public speech,hate crime,ethnic cleansing,freedom of speech,freedom of expression,religious freedom,fundamental human rights,freedom of belief,freedom of information,censorhip,rwanda,Srebrenica,muslims,hebrews,Rohingya,Uyghurs,Khmer Rouge,jewish,arabs,christians,jews,darfur,sudan
  • Sociology - Social Sciences
  • Law - Social Sciences
  • Political Science - Social Sciences
  • Social and Economic Geography - Social Sciences
  • Media and Communications - Social Sciences
  • Other Social Sciences - Social Sciences
  • History and Archeology - Humanities
  • Languages and Literature - Humanities
  • Philosophy, Ethics and Religion - Humanities
  • Anthropology - Social Sciences
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
SFRH/BD/136170/2018 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência-IUL. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.