Alongside non-international and international conflicts, a third category of armed conflict is emerging: hybrid, asymmetric, and transnational conflicts which involve state and non-state actors such as insurgents or terrorist organizations. Unconventional conflicts are among the trend topics of defense and security, and they pose a threat to the stability of international order. States and international organizations, such as the UN and NATO, face difficulty using legal tools currently provided by international law, in particular international humanitarian law (IHL) and the law of war (Geneva and Hague conventions). The question is how current international law applies or can be adapted to these conflicts. There are a few question to be fixed. First, we should find whether new rules are required to deal with situations of hybrid conflict, or if current rules are still valid and can be used/adapted. Secondly, we should determine whether IHL applies in transnational armed conflict against non-state groups, and if their members cease to be targetable during a pause in their active involvement, and whether there can be a non-international armed conflict which has no finite territorial boundaries with a non-state armed group operating transnationally. Lastly, we should assess whether attacks carried out by a transnational organisations and its affiliates meet the criteria of qualifying as a state of armed conflict under IHL

--

Conflict,Law of war,International law,Law of armed conflict,Geneva conventions,Hangue conventions,Terrorism,NATO,UN,United Nations,Hybrid conflict,Transnational conflict,IHL,War on terror,Frozen Conflicts,Asymmetric conflict,War,Civil war

• Law - Social Sciences
• Political Science - Social Sciences
• History and Archeology - Humanities