Scientific journal paper Q1
Who has a better auditory gaydar? Sexual orientation categorization by heterosexual and lesbian, gay and bisexual people
Fábio Fasoli (Fasoli, F.); Anne Maass (Maass, A.); Luna Berghella (Berghella, L.);
Journal Title
Journal of Homosexuality
Year (definitive publication)
2023
Language
English
Country
United States of America
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 12

(Last checked: 2026-07-01 12:24)

View record in Web of Science®


: 1.9
Scopus

Times Cited: 13

(Last checked: 2026-06-20 02:21)

View record in Scopus


: 1.3
Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
Lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) people are supposed to be better at gaydar than heterosexual. Across two studies we examined auditory gaydar performed by LGB and heterosexual listeners. In Study 1 participants (n = 127) listened to male and female speakers (n = 10) and judged their sexual orientation on a binary choice (gay/lesbian vs. heterosexual). In Study 2, participants (n = 192) judged speakers’ (n = 31) sexual orientation on a Kinsey-like scale (1 = exclusively heterosexual, 7 = exclusively gay/lesbian). Results showed gaydar judgments differences in relative terms that did not indicate an overall gaydar accuracy. Moreover, LGB participants were not better at gaydar than heterosexual participants but rather showed a shift in criterion when making auditory gaydar judgments, namely they report a weaker straight categorization bias. Overall, these findings contribute to the understanding of sexual orientation categorization among heterosexual majority and LGB minority groups.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Gaydar,Voice,Sexual orientation,Gender typicality
  • Psychology - Social Sciences