Artigo em revista científica Q1
Who has a better auditory gaydar? Sexual orientation categorization by heterosexual and lesbian, gay and bisexual people
Fábio Fasoli (Fasoli, F.); Anne Maass (Maass, A.); Luna Berghella (Berghella, L.);
Título Revista
Journal of Homosexuality
Ano (publicação definitiva)
2023
Língua
Inglês
País
Estados Unidos da América
Mais Informação
Web of Science®

N.º de citações: 12

(Última verificação: 2026-07-01 12:24)

Ver o registo na Web of Science®


: 1.9
Scopus

N.º de citações: 13

(Última verificação: 2026-06-20 02:21)

Ver o registo na Scopus


: 1.3
Google Scholar

Esta publicação não está indexada no Google Scholar

Esta publicação não está indexada no Overton

Abstract/Resumo
Lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) people are supposed to be better at gaydar than heterosexual. Across two studies we examined auditory gaydar performed by LGB and heterosexual listeners. In Study 1 participants (n = 127) listened to male and female speakers (n = 10) and judged their sexual orientation on a binary choice (gay/lesbian vs. heterosexual). In Study 2, participants (n = 192) judged speakers’ (n = 31) sexual orientation on a Kinsey-like scale (1 = exclusively heterosexual, 7 = exclusively gay/lesbian). Results showed gaydar judgments differences in relative terms that did not indicate an overall gaydar accuracy. Moreover, LGB participants were not better at gaydar than heterosexual participants but rather showed a shift in criterion when making auditory gaydar judgments, namely they report a weaker straight categorization bias. Overall, these findings contribute to the understanding of sexual orientation categorization among heterosexual majority and LGB minority groups.
Agradecimentos/Acknowledgements
--
Palavras-chave
Gaydar,Voice,Sexual orientation,Gender typicality
  • Psicologia - Ciências Sociais