Artigo em revista científica Q1
A realist review to understand the efficacy and outcomes of interventions designed to minimise, reverse or prevent the progression of frailty
Holly Gwyther (Gwyther, H.); Elzbieta Bobrowicz Campos (Bobrowicz-Campos, E.); João Apóstolo (Apóstolo, J. L. A.); Maura Marcucci (Marcucci, M.); Antonio Cano (Cano, A.); Carol Holland (Holland, C.);
Título Revista
Health Psychology Review
Ano (publicação definitiva)
Reino Unido
Mais Informação
Web of Science®

N.º de citações: 26

(Última verificação: 2023-06-03 12:14)

Ver o registo na Web of Science®

: 0.7

N.º de citações: 31

(Última verificação: 2023-06-01 11:09)

Ver o registo na Scopus

: 1.0
Google Scholar

Esta publicação não está indexada no Google Scholar

Interventions to minimise, reverse or prevent the progression of frailty in older adults represent a potentially viable route to improving quality of life and care needs in older adults. Intervention methods used across European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing collaborators were analysed, along with findings from literature reviews to determine ‘what works for whom in what circumstances’. A realist review of FOCUS study literature reviews, ‘real-world’ studies and grey literature was conducted according to RAMESES (Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards), and used to populate a framework analysis of theories of why frailty interventions worked, and theories of why frailty interventions did not work. Factors were distilled into mechanisms deriving from theories of causes of frailty, management of frailty and those based on the intervention process. We found that studies based on resolution of a deficiency in an older adult were only successful when there was indeed a deficiency. Client-centred interventions worked well when they had a theoretical grounding in health psychology and offered choice over intervention elements. Healthcare organisational interventions were found to have an impact on success when they were sufficiently different from usual care. Compelling evidence for the reduction of frailty came from physical exercise, or multicomponent (exercise, cognitive, nutrition, social) interventions in group settings. The group context appears to improve participants’ commitment and adherence to the programme. Suggested mechanisms included commitment to co-participants, enjoyment and social interaction. In conclusion, initial frailty levels, presence or absence of specific deficits, and full person and organisational contexts should be included as components of intervention design. Strategies to enhance social and psychological aspects should be included even in physically focused interventions.
This work was supported by the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (CHAFEA) of the EuropeanCommission, under the European Union Health Programme (2014–2020). The realist review forms part of a larger study, [Grant number 664367 FOCUS]
Realist review,Frailty,Older adults,Elders,Intervention,Outcomes
  • Ciências da Saúde - Ciências Médicas
  • Psicologia - Ciências Sociais
Registos de financiamentos
Referência de financiamento Entidade Financiadora
664367 FOCUS Comissão Europeia

Com o objetivo de aumentar a investigação direcionada para o cumprimento dos Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável para 2030 das Nações Unidas, é disponibilizada no Ciência-IUL a possibilidade de associação, quando aplicável, dos artigos científicos aos Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Estes são os Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável identificados pelo(s) autor(es) para esta publicação. Para uma informação detalhada dos Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável, clique aqui.