Scientific journal paper Q1
A realist review to understand the efficacy and outcomes of interventions designed to minimise, reverse or prevent the progression of frailty
Holly Gwyther (Gwyther, H.); Elzbieta Bobrowicz-Campos (Bobrowicz-Campos, E.); João Apóstolo (Apóstolo, J. L. A.); Maura Marcucci (Marcucci, M.); Antonio Cano (Cano, A.); Carol Holland (Holland, C.);
Journal Title
Health Psychology Review
Year (definitive publication)
2018
Language
English
Country
United Kingdom
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 29

(Last checked: 2024-07-22 09:53)

View record in Web of Science®


: 0.6
Scopus

Times Cited: 32

(Last checked: 2024-07-15 17:46)

View record in Scopus


: 0.7
Google Scholar

Times Cited: 44

(Last checked: 2024-07-16 22:08)

View record in Google Scholar

Abstract
Interventions to minimise, reverse or prevent the progression of frailty in older adults represent a potentially viable route to improving quality of life and care needs in older adults. Intervention methods used across European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing collaborators were analysed, along with findings from literature reviews to determine ‘what works for whom in what circumstances’. A realist review of FOCUS study literature reviews, ‘real-world’ studies and grey literature was conducted according to RAMESES (Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards), and used to populate a framework analysis of theories of why frailty interventions worked, and theories of why frailty interventions did not work. Factors were distilled into mechanisms deriving from theories of causes of frailty, management of frailty and those based on the intervention process. We found that studies based on resolution of a deficiency in an older adult were only successful when there was indeed a deficiency. Client-centred interventions worked well when they had a theoretical grounding in health psychology and offered choice over intervention elements. Healthcare organisational interventions were found to have an impact on success when they were sufficiently different from usual care. Compelling evidence for the reduction of frailty came from physical exercise, or multicomponent (exercise, cognitive, nutrition, social) interventions in group settings. The group context appears to improve participants’ commitment and adherence to the programme. Suggested mechanisms included commitment to co-participants, enjoyment and social interaction. In conclusion, initial frailty levels, presence or absence of specific deficits, and full person and organisational contexts should be included as components of intervention design. Strategies to enhance social and psychological aspects should be included even in physically focused interventions.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (CHAFEA) of the EuropeanCommission, under the European Union Health Programme (2014–2020). The realist review forms part of a larger study, [Grant number 664367 FOCUS]
Keywords
Realist review,Frailty,Older adults,Elders,Intervention,Outcomes
  • Health Sciences - Medical and Health Sciences
  • Psychology - Social Sciences
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
664367 FOCUS Comissão Europeia

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência-IUL. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.