Scientific journal paper Q1
Reducing sexual and reproductive health inequities between natives and migrants: A delphi consensus for sustainable cross-cultural healthcare pathways
Pedro Candeias (Candeias, P.); Violeta Alarcão (Alarcão, V.); Miodraga Stefanovska-Petkovska (Stefanovska-Petkovska, M.); Osvaldo Santos (Santos, O.); Ana Virgolino (Virgolino, A.); Sónia Pintassilgo (Pintassilgo, S.); Patrícia M. Pascoal (Pascoal, P. M. ); Andreia Silva Costa (Costa, A. S.); Fernando Luís Machado (Machado, F.L.); et al.
Journal Title
Frontiers in Public Health
Year (definitive publication)
2021
Language
English
Country
Switzerland
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 6

(Last checked: 2024-12-19 08:00)

View record in Web of Science®


: 0.4
Scopus

Times Cited: 7

(Last checked: 2024-12-11 19:13)

View record in Scopus


: 0.5
Google Scholar

Times Cited: 11

(Last checked: 2024-12-17 11:52)

View record in Google Scholar

Abstract
The increasing number of international migrants (ranging from 153 million in 1990 to ∼272 million in 2019) brought to attention the wide variation of national contexts concerning the policy measures to protect migrants’ rights and ensuring their equal access to basic and essential services, namely in health. Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) is a key component to the overall health and quality of life and is impacted by power inequities inherent to society’s institutions, environment, economics, and culture. In Portugal, guidelines for intervention in SRH are insufficient, a gap that is more pronounced with migrant populations due to the absence of culturally sensitive indicators to assess and monitor SRH. The aim of this work was 2-fold: to identify good practices in the SRH field, with a particular focus, whenever possible, on migrant populations, and to identify relevant and inclusive indicators to monitor SRH in Portugal. A Delphi panel (via online survey) with 66 experts (researchers, teachers, and health professionals) and 16 stakeholders (non-governmental organizations, civil society, and governmental organizations) was implemented in two rounds. Panelists were asked to state their level of agreement (5-point Likert-type scale) regarding four different SRH areas: Sexual Health, Reproductive Health, Social-Structural Factors, and Good Practices. Items were based on literature review and a World Café with 15 experts and stakeholders. Participation rate was 68% and response rate was 97% on the first round. From the initial list of 142 items, a total of 118 (83%) items were approved by consensus. Findings may provide extended opportunities for the healthcare system to engage in better informed decisions and more inclusive and integrative strategies regarding SRH, contributing to build political measures toward sexual and reproductive justice.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Sexual and reproductive health,Health equity,Migrants,Delphi panels,Inequities and inequalities in health
  • Health Sciences - Medical and Health Sciences
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
PTDC/SOC-SOC/30025/2017 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
PT/2018/FAMI/356 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
UIDB/04295/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
UIDP/04295/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
UIDB/03126/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência-IUL. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.