Scientific journal paper Q1
Why are individuals unwilling to report corruption? An inquiry into perception-based definitions of corruption and employment-related factors
Felippe Clemente (Clemente, F.); Luís de Sousa (Sousa, L. de.); Raquel Rego (Raquel Rego); Patrícia Calca (Calca, P.);
Journal Title
Australian Journal of Public Administration
Year (definitive publication)
2024
Language
English
Country
United States of America
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 2

(Last checked: 2025-12-04 14:22)

View record in Web of Science®


: 1.0
Scopus

Times Cited: 2

(Last checked: 2025-11-27 19:21)

View record in Scopus


: 0.7
Google Scholar

Times Cited: 5

(Last checked: 2025-11-29 08:25)

View record in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
Despite the increasing interest and investment in whistle-blowing regulations, policies, and mechanisms, people are still hesitant to report corruption. The existing literature explaining what deters people from reporting serious wrongdoing predominantly concentrates on either organisational factors or personal motivations. Only a limited number of studies integrate objective and subjective individual-level constraints on whistle-blowing. Using original survey data from Portugal, this article investigates two sets of individual-level factors that explain the reluctance to report corruption: employment-related characteristics (objective constraints) and perception-based definitions of corruption (subjective constraints). A regression analysis of the survey data reveals that individuals working in the private sector are less inclined to report corruption compared to public officials. This finding underscores the significance of job security in influencing people's willingness to report corruption. The results also indicate that individuals with a minimalist definition of corruption, perceiving it solely as a legal offence, are more hesitant to report corruption. This finding supports the notion that whistle-blowing policies should not be limited to reporting blatant legal violations instead of any suspected wrongdoing of corporate or public significance. Our study emphasises the need for whistle-blowing policies to not only establish secure and visible mechanisms for reporting serious wrongdoing within organisations, but also to raise awareness of how social norms and job security can impact individuals’ decisions to report such occurrences. This article contributes to whistle-blowing and governance research by shedding light on how perception-based definitions and judgements of corruption, as well as employment-related factors, can influence individuals’ willingness or unwillingness to report corruption.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Corruption,Integrity scenarios,Job precariousness,(Non)reporting,Perceptions,Whistle-blowing
  • Sociology - Social Sciences
  • Political Science - Social Sciences
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
PTDC/CPO-CPO/28316/2017 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência_Iscte. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.