Book chapter
Book of abstracts
Behnam Zendehdel Nobari (Nobari, Behnam Zendehdel); Babak Zendehdel Nobari (Babak Zendehdel Nobari);
Book Title
International Interdisciplinary Conference Transform «The Future of Human Workforce»
Year (definitive publication)
2025
Language
--
Country
--
More Information
--
Web of Science®

This publication is not indexed in Web of Science®

Scopus

This publication is not indexed in Scopus

Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
The rapid integration of AI into organizational operations offers numerous benefits but also presents significant challenges. With the advent of Generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and DeepSeek, AI applications have become increasingly prevalent, generating enthusiasm among experts and managers. However, the unconsidered use of these tools can lead to hidden risks that must be addressed and managed. This research employs Soft Systems Methodology (SSM)—a stakeholder-centric approach—to identify and categorize risks through CATWOE (Customers, Actors, Transformation process, Worldview, Owners, and Environmental constraints) analysis. SSM was selected for its iterative process, which integrates conflicting stakeholder priorities (e.g., executives’ efficiency goals vs. employees’ job security concerns) into a unified risk framework. Through SSM focus groups with 15 cross-functional stakeholders, we identified practical risks not present in the literature, such as employees inadvertently exposing organizational data while over-optimizing AI models. This is in stark contrast to technical risks such as adversarial attacks that have been highlighted in previous studies. The research findings indicate that the hidden risks of AI can be categorized into five areas: (a) Ethical and Social (e.g., dehumanization); (b) Organizational (e.g., over- reliance on AI decision-making); (c) Technical (e.g., poor data quality); (d) Legal (e.g., lack of clear regulations); and (e) Societal (e.g., erosion of trust). The study advocates a paradigm shift toward active AI governance through four strategies: (1) International collaboration (e.g., UN AI advisory bodies); (2) Government mandates (e.g., transparency requirements for high-risk AI systems); (3) Industry standards (e.g., FINRA’s AI compliance guidelines); and (4) Organizational reforms (e.g., establishing Chief AI Officer roles and prioritizing AI literacy programs).
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence (AI),AI risk Management and classification,Soft Systems Methodology (SSM),future workforce,Generative AI,ChatGPT,Copilot,DeepSeek
  • Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering - Engineering and Technology
  • Economics and Business - Social Sciences
  • Other Social Sciences - Social Sciences
  • Anthropology - Social Sciences

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência_Iscte. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.