Artigo em revista científica Q2
Knowledge and use of evidence-based practice in psychology in the clinical practice of Brazilian psychologists: A cross-sectional study
Tamara Melnik (Melnik, T.); Jorge Sinval (Sinval, J.); Vanessa Dordron de Pinho (Pinho, V. D. de.); José Antônio Spencer Hartmann Junior (Hartmann Junior, J. A. S.); Margareth da Silva Oliveira (Oliveira, M. da S.); Fernanda Machado Lopes (Lopes, F. M.);
Título Revista
Healthcare
Ano (publicação definitiva)
2025
Língua
Inglês
País
Suíça
Mais Informação
Web of Science®

N.º de citações: 0

(Última verificação: 2025-03-16 03:24)

Ver o registo na Web of Science®

Scopus

N.º de citações: 0

(Última verificação: 2025-03-15 05:54)

Ver o registo na Scopus

Google Scholar

N.º de citações: 0

(Última verificação: 2025-03-10 19:34)

Ver o registo no Google Scholar

Esta publicação não está indexada no Overton

Abstract/Resumo
Background/Objectives: The use of scientific evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders is crucial for achieving optimal clinical outcomes and providing high-quality care. This study investigates the knowledge, sources of evidence, and attitudes of Brazilian clinical psychologists regarding evidence-based practice in psychology (EBPP) and discusses barriers to its implementation. Methods: A total of 696 Brazilian clinical psychologists participated in an online questionnaire designed to assess their understanding of EBPP, their familiarity with scientific platforms/databases, and their professional development investments. Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted, which can be used to identify subgroups of psychologists with similar patterns of professional and training characteristics. Results: The results indicate that while psychologists recognized the importance of EBPP for effective patient care, there was a significant gap in understanding its fundamental principles and concepts. Many participants reported the limited use of scientific databases, missing opportunities to access the latest research advancements. A lower percentage of psychologists consistently implemented EBPP in their clinical practice, highlighting a gap between knowledge and application. Four latent classes emerged from the LCA: I—experienced/established professional psychologist; II—academic psychologist; III—supervised traditional psychologist; and IV—young professional psychologist. Conclusions: This study emphasizes the need for better integration of EBPP into psychology curricula and continuing education programs. Enhancing clinical psychologists’ understanding and proficiency in EBPP can promote evidence-based decision-making and improve the quality of mental health care in Brazil. Efforts should be made to familiarize psychologists with reliable scientific databases, equip them with skills to critically appraise research, and foster a culture of lifelong learning and professional development. Additionally, it is essential to develop strategies tailored to the distinct profiles of professionals identified in this study, considering their training sources, reference usage, and knowledge of EBPP.
Agradecimentos/Acknowledgements
--
Palavras-chave
Evidence-based psychology,Evidence-based practice in psychology,Clinical practice,Brazil,Clinical psychology
  • Ciências da Saúde - Ciências Médicas
  • Psicologia - Ciências Sociais
Registos de financiamentos
Referência de financiamento Entidade Financiadora
CPCA/A1/435377/2021 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Projetos Relacionados

Esta publicação é um output do(s) seguinte(s) projeto(s):

Com o objetivo de aumentar a investigação direcionada para o cumprimento dos Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável para 2030 das Nações Unidas, é disponibilizada no Ciência_Iscte a possibilidade de associação, quando aplicável, dos artigos científicos aos Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Estes são os Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável identificados pelo(s) autor(es) para esta publicação. Para uma informação detalhada dos Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável, clique aqui.