Scientific journal paper Q2
Patients’ out-of-pocket expenses analysis of presurgical teledermatology
Felipa Sampayo (de Mello-Sampayo, F.);
Journal Title
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Year (definitive publication)
2019
Language
English
Country
United Kingdom
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 7

(Last checked: 2024-07-21 20:33)

View record in Web of Science®


: 0.6
Scopus

Times Cited: 7

(Last checked: 2024-07-21 12:54)

View record in Scopus


: 0.7
Google Scholar

Times Cited: 10

(Last checked: 2024-07-17 22:24)

View record in Google Scholar

Abstract
Background: This study undertakes an economic analysis of presurgical teledermatology from a patient perspective, comparing it with a conventional referral system. Store-and-forward teledermatology allows surgical planning, saving both time and number of visits involving travel, thereby reducing patients’ out-of-pocket expenses, i.e. costs that patients incur when traveling to and from health providers for treatment, visits’ fees, and opportunity cost of time spent in visits. to The study quantifies the opportunity costs and direct costs of visits for adults waiting for dermatology surgery. Method: This study uses a retrospective assessment of 123 patients. Patients’ out-of-pocket expenses of presurgical teledermatology were analyzed in the setting of a public hospital over two years. The teledermatology network covering the area served by the Hospital Garcia da Horta, Portugal, linked the primary care centers of 24 health districts with the hospital’s dermatology department. The patients’ opportunity cost of visits and direct costs of visits (transport costs, and visits’ fee) of each presurgical modality (teledermatology and conventional referral), were simulated from initial primary care visit until surgical intervention. Two groups of patients, those with Squamous Cell Carcinoma and those with Basal Cell Carcinoma, were distinguished in order to compare the patients’ out-of-pocket expenses according to the dermatoses. Results: From a patient perspective, the conventional system was 2.12 times more expensive than presurgical teledermatology. Teledermatology allowed saving €0.74 per patient and per day of delay avoided. This saving was greater in patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma than in patients with Basal Cell Carcinoma. Although, the probabilistic sensitivity analysis corroborates the results of the base case scenario, only a prospective study can substantiate these results. Conclusion: In the Portuguese public healthcare system and under specific cost hypotheses, from a patient economic perspective, teledermatology used for presurgical planning and preparation is the dominant strategy in terms of out-of-pocket expenses, outperforming the conventional referral system, especially for patients with severe dermatoses.
Acknowledgements
Two anonymous reviewers read the manuscript and suggested substantial improvements are gratefully acknowledged. Many thanks to João Furtado Severino Pinto for assisting with the dataset.
Keywords
Economic analysis,Out-of-pocket expenses,Opportunity cost,Teledermatology,Waiting time
  • Clinical Medicine - Medical and Health Sciences
  • Health Sciences - Medical and Health Sciences
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
UID/GES/00315/2019 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

With the objective to increase the research activity directed towards the achievement of the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, the possibility of associating scientific publications with the Sustainable Development Goals is now available in Ciência-IUL. These are the Sustainable Development Goals identified by the author(s) for this publication. For more detailed information on the Sustainable Development Goals, click here.